Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Collared Wolf

This 2013 photo provided by Horsefeathers Photography shows a black wolf wearing a VHF radio collar that identifies it as Wolf  “831F,” a member of the Yellowstone National Park ’s Canyon pack, in Swan Lake, Mont. Big game outfitter William Hoppe shot and killed this female wolf near where 13 sheep were killed in April. Leaders of a wolf advocacy group said Hoppe is intentionally luring the animals by leaving dead sheep carcasses in a pile. Photo: Horsefeathers Photography, Brad Orsted

May 8, 2013

“BOZEMAN, Mont. (AP) — A big game outfitter who shot and killed a collared wolf from Yellowstone National Park is intentionally luring the animals by leaving dead sheep carcasses in a pile, leaders of a wolf advocacy group said.

“Make no mistake about that, it’s definitely intentional baiting,” Marc Cooke, president of Wolves of the Rockies, told The Associated Press on Wednesday.

William Hoppe shot and killed a 2-year old, female wolf Sunday near where 13 sheep were killed in April. He notified Fish, Wildlife and Parks warden Chris Kerin that he killed the wolf using one of his two shoot-on-sight permits the agency issued after the sheep were killed, the Bozeman Daily Chronicle (http://bit.ly/17LAEJ5) reported Wednesday. The permits are valid for 45 days and only allow wolves to be shot on the property where the sheep were killed.

In mid-April, Hoppe, an outspoken opponent of wolves, bought about 30 sheep and started raising them on his property along the Yellowstone River near Gardiner.

On April 24, he awakened to find that two wolves had killed five ewes and eight lambs.

Hoppe “deliberately put the sheep on his property … knowing that the wolves would kill them,” Cooke charged.

Hoppe told the Chronicle he was going to move the rest of the sheep closer to his house and that he had disposed of the dead sheep in a bone pile in the area where they were killed.

“This man needs to be held accountable for baiting,” said Kim Beam, vice president of Wolves of the Rockies. She said the issue would be raised at Thursday’s Fish, Wildlife and Parks commission meeting in Helena, where commissioners will consider the 2013 wolf hunting season.

Animals such as wolves and grizzly bears can smell carcasses a mile away and sometimes further, said Doug Smith, a Yellowstone National Park wolf biologist. He said the wolf that was killed Sunday may have been attracted by the decaying meat.

Smith said information from the wolf’s radio collar indicated that she was not involved in killing Hoppe’s sheep.

Hoppe is a former president of the Friends of the Northern Yellowstone Elk Herd. In January, he opposed the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission’s decision to close wolf hunting around Yellowstone National Park. He argues wolves are driving down the elk population in the area.

He did not return a phone call seeking comment.”

Special thanks to http://www.chron.com/default/article/Activists-say-wolf-killer-is-baiting-the-animals-4498538.php for providing this information!


Wolf Geographic

“ANCHORAGE,  Alaska (AP) — A second interior Alaska wolf has tested positive for rabies, the  Alaska  Department of Fish and Game announced Thursday.

A  trapper captured the wolf March 15 near Chandalar Lake near the foothills of the  Brooks range about 185 miles north of Fairbanks, the same general location as a  rabid wolf shot last month. The trapper killed the wolf, skinned it and fed raw  meat from the carcass to his dog team, said spokeswoman Cathie  Harms. The five dogs are in quarantine in Fairbanks.

The  dogs had been vaccinated for rabies but will be given booster shots, the  department said.

Rabies,  according to the Centers  for Disease Control and Prevention, is a viral disease that can infect  mammals, including humans. It’s usually transmitted through bites but can also  spread by coming into contact with infected nerve tissue such as brains or  spinal cords.

The  rabies virus infects the central nervous system and can cause death, according  to the CDC.

Rabies  is regularly detected in Arctic foxes along Alaska’s west and north coasts but  had not been found south of the Brooks Range since statehood in 1959, the  department said.

“We’re  still trying to get a clearer picture of the current situation, especially in  wolves in the Chandalar Lake area,” Dr. Kimberlee Beckmen, a department  veterinarian, said in the announcement. “We’d really like to hear from the  people who have seen wolves or other wildlife acting abnormally in that area.  Abnormal behavior can also be caused by diseases other than rabies, such as  distemper, so a test of brain tissue is required for a definitive diagnosis of  the disease.”

Both  rabid wolves exhibited abnormal behavior when they were killed.

Wolves  normally are shy, but a trapper who shot the wolf last month said the animal had  closely approached him.

The  trapper, a man who lives near Palmer, took the animal home with him and cut  himself while skinning it. Worried that the animal may have been infected, he  sent the head in for testing and discarded the rest of the carcass in a  wooded area.

When  the department confirmed rabies, which can be spread to other animals that eat  nerve tissue such as brains or spinal cords, the carcass was retrieved. The  carcass had been scavenged, but the spinal cord had not been disturbed,  officials said.

The  wolf caught in a leg trap March 15 was alive when the trapper approached but  appeared dull and unaware, the department said.

The  trapper killed the animal, skinned it and fed the raw meat to his dogs.

Beckman  said they should not have been fed the carcass.

“It’s  very dangerous to feed raw carcasses of wildlife, especially carnivores, to  pets,” Beckmen said. “Pets can not only become infected, they can then transmit  diseases and parasites to their owners, rabies, tularemia and echinococcus being  the most serious.”

Echinococcus  is a bacterial infection, Harms said.

Rabies  had not been diagnosed in the region in 54 years of statehood, but archived  territorial reports document cases of rabies in fox and dogs in interior Alaska,  the department said.

Beckmen  said she’s looking for more samples from the heads of wolves, wolverines, foxes  or coyotes killed near the Chandalar Lakes or Fortymile River areas.

Rabies  has been detected over the winter along the north and west coasts and more cases  are expected in the arctic fox and red fox populations. Village dogs, the  department said, are vulnerable to infection from foxes.

Alaska  health officials warn trappers and hunters to wear gloves when skinning animals,  wash wounds with soap and water, wash knives after cutting off heads and avoid  cutting into brains or spinal cords.”

Special thanks to DAN JOLING, Associated Press, for providing the information in this post! 

 


Wolf Geographic

Photograph by Joel Sartore

“Gray wolves once populated large portions of North America, Europe, and Asia, but were hunted to near extinction.

Wolves are legendary because of their spine-tingling howl, which they use to communicate. A lone wolf howls to attract the attention of his pack, while communal howls may send territorial messages from one pack to another. Some howls are confrontational. Much like barking domestic dogs, wolves may simply begin howling because a nearby wolf has already begun.

Wolves are the largest members of the dog family. Adaptable gray wolves are by far the most common and were once found all over the Northern Hemisphere. But wolves and humans have a long adversarial history. Though they almost never attack humans, wolves are considered one of the animal world’s most fearsome natural villains. They do attack domestic animals, and countless wolves have been shot, trapped, and poisoned because of this tendency.

In the lower 48 states, gray wolves were hunted to near extinction, though some populations survived and others have since been reintroduced. Few gray wolves survive in Europe, though many live in Alaska, Canada, and Asia.

Red wolves live in the southeastern United States, where they are endangered. These animals actually became extinct in the wild in 1980. Scientists established a breeding program with a small number of captive red wolves and have reintroduced the animal to North Carolina. Today, perhaps 100 red wolves survive in the wild.

The maned wolf, a distant relative of the more familiar gray and red wolves, lives in South America. Physically, this animal resembles a large, red fox more than its wolf relatives.

Wolves live and hunt in packs of around six to ten animals. They are known to roam large distances, perhaps 12 miles (20 kilometers) in a single day. These social animals cooperate on their preferred prey—large animals such as deer, elk, and moose. When they are successful, wolves do not eat in moderation. A single animal can consume 20 pounds (9 kilograms) of meat at a sitting. Wolves also eat smaller mammals, birds, fish, lizards, snakes, and fruit.

Wolfpacks are established according to a strict hierarchy, with a dominant male at the top and his mate not far behind. Usually this male and female are the only animals of the pack to breed. All of a pack’s adults help to care for young pups by bringing them food and watching them while others hunt.”

Fast Facts:

Size relative to a 6-ft (2-m) man:

Wolf Size and Human

Type:
Mammal
Diet:
Carnivore
Average life span in the wild:
6 to 8 years
Size:
Head and body, 36 to 63 in (91 to 160 cm); Tail, 13 to 20 in (33 to 51 cm)
Weight:
40 to 175 lbs (18 to 79 kg)
Group name:
Pack
Protection status:
Endangered
 

**Special thanks to National Geographic for providing this information!


wolf down

Takepart.com – Tue, Apr 23, 2013

“Of the top reasons tourists travel thousands of miles for a 12-hour round-trip bus ride into Denali National Park, wolves rank right up there with grizzly bears and the sight of 20,320-foot Mount McKinley on a rare bluebird day. To the few who know, members of Denali’s wolf population are also some of the longest, continuously studied animal groups in the world, besting even Jane Goodall’s chimps. But in recent years, wolf numbers in the 7,370-square-mile park have decreased even faster than the TV audience of Sarah Palin’s Alaska on TLC. In 2007, Denali Park biologists counted 147 wolves in nine groups that roamed the 93-year-old park. But in their most recent count, taken last autumn, numbers had declined to 54, the lowest since 1986.

Some, like the Alaska Board of Game, blame this die-off on natural causes—wolves killing wolves and low sheep populations. But others, including private citizens, park biologists, and members of the environmental advocacy group the Alaska Wildife Alliance (AWA), believe there are more sinister reasons. According to some AWA members, the recent, radical decline of the park’s most visible wolves—called the Grant Creek group—is the result of three main factors: the dissolution of Denali’s protective buffer zone, the Palin-appointed Alaska Board of Game, and the acute, ethically questionable actions of a small handful of local trappers, including a man named Coke Wallace.

 We’ll start with the protective buffer zone. Between 1966 and 2009, celebrated wolf biologist Gorden Haber studied wolves, on the ground, in Denali, hundreds of hours each year. During his extensive observation, Haber witnessed wolves wandering just outside the park and trappers laying their snares along the park’s boundary to kill these wolves. Thanks to his studies, Haber was able, in 2000, to convince the then-Board of Game to establish a protective buffer along the outside edge of the park, within a finger of state land, where wolf trapping was otherwise legal. Tragically, Haber died in a plane crash while observing wolves in late 2009. And the following March, the Board of Game rescinded the protective area.

Trappers once again position their snares along the park boundary, killing not only adult wolves, but pups. And last May, in an act that infuriated both wolf advocates and the usually detached Denali Park Service, the local trapper, Coke Wallace, hitched a dead horse to his four-wheeler, dragged it to the park boundary, and used it to lure and snare the pregnant alpha female of the park’s wolf group, Grant Creek.

AWA member Marybeth Holleman studied these ongoing events as she wrote her forthcoming book, Among Wolves, a profile of the late biologist Gordon Haber. She says that Denali Park biologist Tom Meier (also recently deceased) reported that he and other park biologists believed declining wolf populations weren’t the result of declining prey. Nor did they blame habitat, which is abundant in the 6.3 million-acre park. That, Meier said, left two causes: trapping on park borders and the vigorous predator-control program against bears and wolves currently under way in areas adjacent to the park. “What Tom told me is that when game officials do intensive predator control, it creates a vacuum,” says Holleman. “He believed that Denali wolves may have expanded their territory to fill it.”

Holleman, along with several wolf advocacy groups, have petitioned the Board of Game to “reinstate the protective buffer.” But in about six attempts, between 2010 and present, the Board refused and created a potentially illegal eight-year “moratorium” on even discussing the buffer zone. At its January meeting, the Board also discussed the petition “behind closed doors,” possibly violating the Alaska Open Meetings Act. The AWA has filed a lawsuit contesting the Board’s conduct with that meeting, results withstanding.

Another petition to reinstate the buffer will be discussed at the next meeting of the Board of Game, this May.”

*Special thanks to http://news.yahoo.com/secret-reasons-wolves-dying-denali-212011543.html?bcmt=1366763539830-6fe0d306-033a-4655-b7a9-42b6a9d169c4_00002s000000000000000000000000-82acbcc7-8567-4b35-ad73-3b7c4a4277d6&bcmt_s=e#mediacommentsugc_container, for providing this information!


Gray Wolf Pup

“ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—Officials confirmed Wednesday that an animal killed by a federal employee in southwestern New Mexico in January was a Mexican gray wolf.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said genetic tests confirmed it was a small, uncollared female. More tests are under way to determine which pack the wolf was associated with.

In January, an employee with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services shot what officials described at the time as a “canine.” The employee reported the shooting because the animal looked like a Mexican wolf after closer inspection.

The wolf was shot from about 250 yards away, officials said.

“Our specialist, at the time, was upset and that’s why he reported it. Still, we’re disappointed that it occurred,” said Carol Bannerman, a spokeswoman at Wildlife Services headquarters.

The Mexican gray wolf was added to the federal endangered species list in 1976. The effort to reintroduce the wolves in New Mexico and Arizona has stumbled due to legal battles, illegal shootings and other problems.

Federal officials have been tightlipped about the January shooting. They have not said what prompted the employee to shoot but implied that he may have thought it was a coyote. The employee was in the Mangas area investigating cattle deaths when the shooting occurred.

Bannerman said the employee remains on the job and the agency is cooperating with the Fish and Wildlife Service.  The case been turned over to the U.S. attorney’s office for review.”

*Special thanks to The Associated Press, http://www.ruidosonews.com/ci_23098618/feds-confirm-employee-killed-mexican-gray-wolf for providing this information!


wolf hunted

**Animal activists say bill denies voters a voice**

“LANSING, Mich. (WOOD) – Michigan lawmakers are looking to shift the power of deciding which animals — including gray wolves — can be hunted from the legislature to the Department of Natural Resources.

The sponsors of  Senate Bill 288 say the issue is about science and believe the Michigan DNR’s  Natural Resources Commission is better suited than the legislature to determine if an animal like a wolf should be placed on the state’s gaming list, meaning it can be hunted.

Animal rights activists, however, disagree.

Once  gray wolves were removed from the endangered species list in 2012,  legislation was passed allowing for them to be hunted in Michigan. The wolf population in Michigan sits at 658, mainly in the Upper Peninsula.

Since then, animal rights organizations like the Humane Society and Keep Michigan Wolves Protected have gathered more than 250,000 signatures to place a referendum on next year’s ballot to repeal part of that law and stop the wolf hunt.

But Senate Bill 288 could override those ballot efforts and pave the way for wolf hunting as early as this fall.

Currently, adding a species to the gaming list has to go through the elected legislature.  SB 288 would give that power exclusively to the Natural Resources Commission — a seven-member, non-elected, governor-appointed panel.

“Basically, the Natural Resources Commission can continue to make these decisions so our wildlife in Michigan is managed based on sound science,” said bill co-sponsor Sen. Dave Hildenbrand (R-Lowell). “We have a lot of data about the population, about disease control, about public safety and there’s a lot of research being done on that for all of our species, all of our game all of our wildlife.”

SB 288 would also, in effect,  allow the NRC to override any ballot challenges put forth through a public referendum that could repeal the hunting of wolves. Animals rights groups say that silences the public’s voice.

“We just turned in more than a quarter-million signatures to the Secretary of State’s Office from Michigan voters saying that they do not want to see wolves hunted and trapped in our state, so in issues like this of great importance to citizens, they want to be able to use their voice to speak up,” State Humane Society Director and Keep Michigan Wolves Protected member Jill Fritz told 24 Hour News 8 in a phone interview.

Hildenbrand said lawmakers are still tweaking SB 288 and plan to remove a controversial $1 million appropriation that would have prevented the public from challenging SB 288 itself later through ballot referendum.

But if SB 288 passes, the NRC will still hold  public hearings. One is already scheduled for next month, during which members will vote on whether or not to hold a wolf hunt.

Even if SB 288 passes, the legislature will still hold the power to remove a species from the gaming list, though they cannot add one, DNR spokesman Ed Golden said. Even if an animal is added to the list, it does not mean they will for absolutely be open to hunt. The NRC will have to hold public hearings first.

Fritz also said there are already laws in place that will not be effected by SB 288 that allow farmers or residents to kill wolves that are actively attacking live stock or pets. This is another reason Keep Michigan Wolves Protects feels it is not necessary to allow an active hunt of wolves.

A vote is expected Thursday. If it passes in the Senate, it will go to the House for a vote. “

*Special thanks to Marc Thompson, http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/michigan/senate-bill-would-give-dnr-hunt-creation-power for providing this information!


Gray Wolf Pup

“GRAND RAPIDS, MI — Does a proposed law working through the state Senate put Michigan wolves in danger?

A number of letter writers say the public should have a direct say in protecting wildlife from hunters, and stand in opposition to a bill co-sponsored by Grand Rapids-area state Sens. David Hildenbrand, R-Lowell, and Arlan Meekhof, R-West Olive.

Pat Hartsoe attended a recent hearing in Lansing:

Last week I attended the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Environment and Great Lakes. I came away feeling marginalized by the thinly-veiled political process I witnessed. Senate Bill 288 (co-sponsored by State Sen. Dave Hildenbrand, R-Lowell) was discussed.

SB 288 would allow the Natural Resources Commission to designate animals as “game species.” This bill was quickly introduced April 9, shortly after 250,000 registered voter signatures were delivered to the Secretary of State office in Lansing. I helped collect those signatures during bitter winter weather. The petition would require a public vote in 2014 on wolf hunting.
One problem with SB 288 is that if the NRC designates an animal a game species, concerned citizens would not be able to reverse this decision with a ballot referendum as they could with legislative decisions. Further, the NRC is an appointed, not elected, group.

Only one member has a science background. Two nationally-recognized scientists from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula with 30 years of wolf research experience were never consulted. After hearing public input, a 5 to 2 vote in favor was quickly taken. The bill moved to the Senate and could become law in less than two weeks.

I see a disturbing pattern developing in Michigan politics. In my opinion, if individuals get involved with legal, organized and timely opposition to an issue, politicians shouldn’t disenfranchise them by passing quickly-crafted and referendum-proof laws.

Think emergency manager. Think right to work. Think keep Michigan wolves protected. I am sorely disappointed by what I witnessed in Lansing.

PAT HARTSOE Grand Rapids

People should vote on hunting issues

In a deliberate attempt to circumvent the constitutional rights of the voters in Michigan, State Sen. Senator Tom Casperson (R-Escanaba) introduced Senate Bill-288 on April 9, 2013. It was approved by a 5 to 2 vote by the Natural Resources, Environment, and Great Lakes Committee and eventually goes to the Governor to be signed into law.

This bill would effectively nullify the efforts of a coalition of over 2,000 conservationists, Native American tribes, scientists and animal welfare interests who turned in more than 255,000 signatures from Michigan voters to place Public Act 520, listing wolves as a game species, to a referendum vote in November 2014.

SB 288 is an obvious attempt to prevent citizens from being able to conduct a constitutionally-guaranteed right to ballot referendum to reverse decisions by the legislature.

In 2006, Michigan voters overwhelmingly rejected a law to allow sport hunting of mourning doves – showing their desire to have the right to vote on wildlife issues. Voters rejected this, casting more votes against shooting doves than they did for any candidate that election. If SB 288 passes, this decisive outcome would be reversed.

SB 288 is a blatant display of political bullying that will put Michigan’s declining wolf population further at risk.

This bill is an extreme power grab by politicians and a deliberate attempt to subvert democracy and silence the voices of Michigan voters.

This type of political maneuvering by our elected officials must be stopped.

HARRY T. EDWARDS Kent City Wolf bill is an abuse of power

A few weeks ago, the Keep Michigan Wolves Protected campaign submitted over 255,000 signatures from registered Michigan voters opposed to sport hunting for wolves. This right to seek a voter referendum on legislation is guaranteed in the Michigan Constitution.

Unfortunately, the politicians in Lansing who most want to see wolves, recently introduced legislation (SB 288) which is exclusively aimed at nullifying this referendum and assuring that Michigan citizens never have a say again in hunting issues. This is not an exaggeration.

The legislation specifically removes all authority of citizens to have a voice about which animals are hunted in Michigan.

Even if you are in favor of hunting wolves, you should be very upset about this abuse of power. Drafting legislation specifically to silence Michigan voters who are following a constitutionally-guaranteed process is a stunning insult to democracy.

Please contact your state senator and state representative immediately and insist that they VOTE NO on SB 288.

TOM LYON New Era

People should decide on wolves

There is a new bill SB288 going through the State Senate this week that will take away all rights of the people of the state to make decisions on any wildlife.

Keep Michigan Wolves Protected collected and submitted 253,000 signatures from people around the state to put the upcoming wolf hunt on the Michigan Ballot in 11/2014. In the meantime, the hunt would be on hold until after the people voted.

Well, Sen. Tom Casperson submitted a bill this last week that would take all rights away from the citizens to have a say on any wildlife issues for all time. It would make the signatures mute, and silence the people and their wishes. This bill will change the constitution of the state and take away peoples voices on any wildlife issues.

He is upset because the wolf hunt which he had submitted, got the brakes put on it by the citizens of the state. So now he is attempting to take away all citizens rights when it comes to wildlife. People need to speak out.

They are changing a law that has been in place since 1908. And ballot proposals in the past that wanted to change our state constitution, were all readily defeated. This bill needs to be stopped. People need to contact their senators and reps……and quickly.  It could be law within eight days.

DOROTHY RODGERS Georgetown Township

Lawmakers not following will of the people

Not surprisingly, once again in our State legislature it appears that there is a “do as I say and not as I do” mentality. I am speaking in regard to SB 288 which is being fast tracked to a vote by State Sen. Tom Casperson R-Escanaba. This bill would sign legislation into law that would circumvent Michigan voter’s right to referendum, and includes a non-related appropriation that prevents the voters from rejecting the measure by referendum.

This bill, this is the good Senator’s response to the 253,000 signatures that were delivered to the Secretary of State in March, asking that another bill he was fast tracking; to allow a wolf hunt in Michigan, be put to Voter referendum in 2014.

Apparently Mr. Casperson, who prides himself on being a “sportsman” has no problem trying to write legislation that takes away Michigan voter rights when he doesn’t get his way. In this case, a trophy wolf hunt. This is truly unsportsmanlike conduct in the highest degree as the Senator has little or no regard for due process, let alone the opinions of 253,000 voters…..which was simply to let us decide whether a wolf hunt would be in the best interest of all of Michigan’s residents.

Regardless of how you feel about hunting, this bill works to undermine our right to referendum and to keep our lawmakers in check. I urge you, call or write your legislators and urge them to vote no on SB288.

MARGO BURIAN Grand Rapids”

**Special thanks to:  MLive/Grand Rapids Press guest opinion The Grand Rapids Press, for providing this information!     

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 179 other followers

%d bloggers like this: